Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

@zubair_nocode While the value proposition "we help entrepreneurs build & launch their start-up" communicates the core offering of building and launching businesses, it could use some adjustments to be more impactful and better align with the no-code software development company's mission.

1 0 1 68 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@zubair_nocode An improved value proposition for consideration might be: "Empower entrepreneurs to rapidly build and launch start-ups with our cost-effective, no-code software platform."

0 0 1 69 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@zubair_nocode Target audience: Ensure that the target audience (entrepreneurs) is addressed directly to make the connection with the company's services stronger.

0 0 1 65 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@zubair_nocode Focus on benefits: Mention the advantages of using no-code software development, such as faster development, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use.

0 0 1 61 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@zubair_nocode Specificity: It could be more explicit about the use of no-code software development in the process of building and launching start-ups.

0 0 1 61 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@SmuldersStefan Send

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@SmuldersStefan Send

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@TheNoCodeDev @dittofi @bubble There is quite a big discussion about various nocode platforms here, including @ditiofi that could be worth reading t.me/bubble_alterna…

0 0 1 37 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@NocodeTalks Sorry bad joke, kettles for boling water use a lot of power.

1 0 0 31 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@NocodeTalks

0 0 1 31 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@brian_andrews @joshsnow @bubble Has anyone got any details on what costitutes efficient workflows?

1 0 0 72 0

View Details

Stuart 👌💥 @CoreAspectAI

3 years ago

@theadityapati @bubble @weweb_io @webflow @dittofi @flutterflow Depending on your application and clients outsystems.com

1 0 0 129 0

View Details

Thomas O'Duffy @ThomasODuffy

3 years ago

@bubble Your pricing update seems niave - like you haven’t thought through the psychology or scale of opportunity at all? Here is why: - compute costs are trending lower than ever - taking advantage of AI workflows requires more steps and data - next-gen apps will transform more data - advantages of easy complex nocode EVAPORATE when running apps costs a big multiple of firebase or code options - pricing uncertainty is hugely psychologically inhibitory making things hard to plan & making SLO (self liquidating offers) / net LTV vs CPA much harder to make sense of (the bedrock of SAAS campaigns) - who wants the dilemma of a someone browsing a complex etsy like marketplace costing 2c per page load because there are 100 WU per page? - Nocoders seek simplicity… not optimisation overwhelm MOST OF ALL, you’re much better off having people do more & play more than taxing every extra feature every time it is run - when costs are very far from negligible. It is super silly to disincentivise devs from doing cool stuff experimentally unless they’re rich or are sure they can monetise. What a psychological bore to constantly weigh every feature against elastic bills that add up fast… like trying to invent a cocktail while having to think about buying a round for 1000 people in the pub. You’ll drive many high volume apps away; inhibit innovation; make devs worry about traction for non simple apps. Have you thought through the inhibitory psychology of this at all? Do you really want devs to turn off cool features instead of making the best software? You’re literally inverting the coolness of creation & the joy of productivity if every workflow is like a tax * DAU/MAU; and you EITHER run with an uncapped budget or can’t uphold quality of service. MADNESS! Monetisation and traction and engagement aren’t linear at all. WU literally tax engagement. Instead I suggest you: - Charge fixed fees for subscriptions at different tiers - Charge a 150% dropping to 50% markup on underlying compute costs. Make this such good value people running on Bubble can compete in price elastic markets against AI refactored code apps. - Allow users to optionally trade spare pre-purchased compute capacity (& take a cut for facilitating… like the early days of double click). - Go for scale & certainty - so it makes no economic sense to rebuild elsewhere. Get long term lock-in, not bait and switch where extract more value from a locked in dependent community. Take note, OpenAI reduced API costs by 90% - Super refactor underlying system & offer AI refactoring tools to bubble devs. You have economies of scale. - Consider a sliver of revenue (2%?) for “bubble centric” startups grossing > 20k/mo with benefits that are with it You’ll get more scale & subscription revenue this way without inhibitory psychology - closer to AWS than taxing every feature into elastic risk. Instead of architecting churn via WU dilemmas, this steer, if you choose to accept it, will put @bubble on course to rocket past 1Bn in revenue - because this kind of pricing structure will make bubble inevitable. cc @emmanuel_s